Encouraging outcomes of using a small-donor single graft in pediatric kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The use of small pediatric kidneys as single grafts for transplantation is controversial, due to the potential risk for graft thrombosis and insufficient nephron mass. METHODS: Aiming to test the benefits of transplanting these kidneys, 375 children who underwent kidney transplantation in a single center were evaluated: 49 (13.1%) received a single graft from a small pediatric donor (≤ 15 kg, SPD group), 244 (65.1%) from a bigger pediatric donor (> 15 kg, BPD group), and 82 (21.9%) from adult living donors (group ALD). RESULTS: Groups had similar baseline main characteristics. After 5 years of follow-up, children from the SPD group were comparable to children from BPD and ALD in patient survival (94%, 96%, and 98%, respectively, p = 0.423); graft survival (89%, 88%, and 93%, respectively, p = 0.426); the frequency of acute rejection (p = 0.998); the incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (p = 0.671); the odds ratio for severely increased proteinuria (p = 0.357); the rates of vascular thrombosis (p = 0.846); and the necessity for post-transplant surgical intervention prior to discharge (p = 0.905). The longitudinal evolution of eGFR was not uniform among groups. The three groups presented a decrease in eGFR, but the slope of the curve was steeper in ALD children. At 5 years, the eGFR of the ALD group was 10 ml/min/1.73m2 inferior to the others. At that time, the eGFR from the SPD group was statistically similar to the BPD group (p = 0.952). CONCLUSION: In a specialized transplant center, the use of a single small pediatric donor kidney for transplantation is as successful as bigger pediatric or adult living donors, after 5 years of follow-up. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Is Preoperative Preparation Time a Barrier to Small Children Being Ready for Kidney Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Small children are less frequently transplanted when compared with older. The objective of the present study was to compare the preparation time for transplantation in children of different weights and to identify factors associated with a delay in the workup of small children. METHODS: We report on a retrospective cohort comprising all children referred for renal transplantation (RTx) workup between 2009 and 2017. The main outcome was transplantation workup time, defined as the time elapsed between the first consultation and when the child became ready for the surgery. RESULTS: A total of 389 children (63.5% males) were selected, with a median weight of 18 kg (interquartile range, 11-32). Patients were categorized into 2 groups: group A (study group): ≤15 kg (n = 165) and group B (control group): >15 kg (n = 224). The probability of being ready for RTx was comparable between groups A and B. The cumulative incidence rate difference between groups is -0.05 (95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.02). The median time for RTx workup was 5.4 (2.4-9.4) in group A and 4.3 (2.2-9.0) months in group B (P = 0.451). Moreover, the presence of urinary tract malformation was associated with the need for longer transplantation workup time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In children >7 kg, the workup time for transplantation is not related to body weight. In a specialized center, children weighing 7-15 kg became ready within the same timeframe as children weighing >15 kg, despite the smaller children had greater difficulty being nourished, dialyzed, and a greater need for surgical correction of the urinary tract pretransplant.